MB

 

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Drones, Grrr


Status: Offline
Posts: 1547
Date:
RE: Drones, Grrr


John Watson wrote:

Still fuming having stood next to some w****r flying a large drone at Risley Moss. I didn't feel I could intervene because I didn't know the law. The warden was temporarily off-site, but I spoke to him later

He had a PC console, with friends all watching the new toy. It had a visualisation headset. It flew at ~2000 feet over the moss. It landed next to my wife

https://www.caa.co.uk/Consumers/Unmanned-aircraft/Recreational-drones/Recreational-drone-flights

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/law-drone-camera-flying-uk-1842082

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/drones-are-you-flying-yours-safely-and-legally

Offences committed:
- Warrington BC doesn't permit drones over its land
- Operator must maintain direct unaided visual contact with the aircraft - ie, not using a headset
- Way above the maximum altitude of 400 feet
- drones >250 g must be registered with CAA (newly active regulation)
- wasn't 150 feet from people - it landed just 15 feet away from Liz (and several other people)
- video camera used over private land without permission

Offences have a max fine of £1,000

There are expected to be even more regulations following the Gatwick incident

Given the safety issue alone, I should probably have called 999 - as should you


 John,

I'd have asked him what he was doing August 12th, as there are some nice grouse moors in the Pennines he could fly it over to the (hopefully) inconvenience of others.



__________________

While we exist, all else is at risk.



Status: Offline
Posts: 464
Date:

Still fuming having stood next to some w****r flying a large drone at Risley Moss. I didn't feel I could intervene because I didn't know the law. The warden was temporarily off-site, but I spoke to him later

He had a PC console, with friends all watching the new toy. It had a visualisation headset. It flew at ~2000 feet over the moss. It landed next to my wife

https://www.caa.co.uk/Consumers/Unmanned-aircraft/Recreational-drones/Recreational-drone-flights

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/law-drone-camera-flying-uk-1842082

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/drones-are-you-flying-yours-safely-and-legally

Offences committed:
- Warrington BC doesn't permit drones over its land
- Operator must maintain direct unaided visual contact with the aircraft - ie, not using a headset
- Way above the maximum altitude of 400 feet
- drones >250 g must be registered with CAA (newly active regulation)
- wasn't 150 feet from people - it landed just 15 feet away from Liz (and several other people)
- video camera used over private land without permission

Offences have a max fine of £1,000

There are expected to be even more regulations following the Gatwick incident

Given the safety issue alone, I should probably have called 999 - as should you

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

RODIS

 

This forum is dedicated to the memory of Eva Janice McKerchar.